-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Super Slow TFLite YOLOX-Nano (m) inference time speed compared to yolov5 #318
Comments
How did you get tflite model? And can you tell more detail about your device you use? |
thank you for your reply. #First create the frozen graph using the following command: onnx-tf convert -i "yolox_s.onnx" -o "yolox_s.pb" |
There are something I think it may be helpful:
|
Thanks for the notes |
Hi, |
Thanks for your helps |
@tucachmo2202 In PINTO_model_zoo/132_YOLOX, there is a script called "download_nano.sh". Please launch "download_nano.sh" to download all files then you can find missing "yolox_nano_320x320_tf.xml". |
@Neo1109-Chang-RTK, Thanks. I fixed my problem! |
Hello,
Many thanks for sharing your code,
I was wondering if a comparison between YOLOV5 (ultralytics) and the present YOLOX about inference time speed has been done?
For yoloV5 (Small) TFLite with 1 thread, I get around 62 FPS.
For YOLOX (nano), the FPS value is around 1 FPS and for YOLOX (Tiny), FPS value is around 6.5 FPS. However, I was expecting to obtain a higher FPS value using YOLOX.
Am I missing something here?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: