Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unusual BV Balancing in FG3 contract #5661

Closed
4 tasks done
Lapras opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5672
Closed
4 tasks done

Unusual BV Balancing in FG3 contract #5661

Lapras opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5672

Comments

@Lapras
Copy link
Contributor

Lapras commented Jan 6, 2025

Brief Description *

I took a contract on the nightly from 1/2 to test a lot of the new stratcon features. In that campaign, I took a contract against the Taurian Concordat. Relief duty against Green/D enemies. It seemed to be a lot more of a cakewalk than it should be. And by this I mean that the Taurians regularly fielded ~1.5K BV every m mission. Whereas the FedSuns had 2K-4K of reinforcements in addition to my own lances. I am not awware of what parts of FG3 makes it this way or if this is intended. But it seems like the BV of my opponent is way undervalued in this mission, for a 3 skull contract. As my experience with other similar contracts usually have better BV balancing. I'm attaching a save at the beggining and endd of the contract so you can see all the battles that happened.

3. Steps to Reproduce

  1. Load save
  2. Play contract
  3. See BV values being weird

Attach Files

Dakka Contracting30350108.cpnx.gz
Dakka Contracting30350316.cpnx.gz

Severity *

Low (Minor/Nuisance): Minor glitches or cosmetic issues that don't affect gameplay and occur rarely.

MekHQ Suite Version *

50.0.03-SNAPSHOT

Operating System *

Windows 10

Java Version *

Eclipse Adoptium 21.0.5

Final Verification

  • I confirm this is a single, unique issue that hasn't been reported before
  • I have included all necessary information and files to help reproduce this issue
  • I have asked on MegaMek Discord about this issue
  • I have confirmed this issue is being opened on the correct repository: MegaMek, MegaMekLab, or MekHQ
@IllianiCBT
Copy link
Collaborator

To confirm: you have no custom units?

also, can you attach the logs at the time this scenario was generated?

@IllianiCBT
Copy link
Collaborator

Also revision to my last comment: I don’t suppose you have any pre-scenario saves? That will allow me to actually test the scenarios.

@IllianiCBT
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as resolved

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants