Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

heater error/printer halt after M600 bugfix 2.0.x #20616

Closed
phongshader opened this issue Dec 31, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

heater error/printer halt after M600 bugfix 2.0.x #20616

phongshader opened this issue Dec 31, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@phongshader
Copy link

Bug Description

heater halts after M600

Configuration Files

Marlin bugfix 2.0.x 12/03/2020
bttgtr_conf.zip

Steps to Reproduce

  1. have filament sensor trigger/run M600
  2. load filament
  3. heater fault/printer halt when trying to get hot end back up to temp

Expected behavior:
hot end gets up to temp and resumes print

Actual behavior:
printer halts on heater error

Additional Information

this is the heater graph after M600:
Screen Shot 2020-12-31 at 9 36 02 AM
this is lowering the temp from 220 to 190, this halts the printer too.
Screen Shot 2020-12-31 at 9 53 11 AM
I changed these settings in configuration_adv:
#define WATCH_TEMP_PERIOD 40 // Seconds changed to 40 from 20 still halted
#define WATCH_TEMP_INCREASE 2

#if ENABLED(THERMAL_PROTECTION_HOTENDS)
#define THERMAL_PROTECTION_PERIOD 60 // Seconds changed from 20 to 60 still halted
#define THERMAL_PROTECTION_HYSTERESIS 4

At first I thought this was a hardware issue. I changed the heater cartridge, thermistor, eventually, motherboard (for reasons unrelated to this issue). Here is the support thread with the motherboard maker makerbase-mks/MKS-RUMBA32#26 I have switched to a BTT GTR board and the problem persists.

@phongshader phongshader changed the title heater errors heater error/printer halt after M600 bugfix 2.0.x Dec 31, 2020
@phongshader
Copy link
Author

I disabled thermal runaway protection and the M600 ran as expected. I used a stopwatch to measure the time it took the HE to get to temp and it was 80 sec. I increased both #define WATCH_TEMP_PERIOD and #define THERMAL_PROTECTION_PERIOD 60 to 80then re-enabled thermal runaway protection and that seemed to fix the issue. Is it ok/safe to increase these times to that level?

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2021

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 4, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant