Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No automation logs in docker logs output #22553

Open
BrGitHub11 opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 12 comments
Open

No automation logs in docker logs output #22553

BrGitHub11 opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 12 comments

Comments

@BrGitHub11
Copy link

I installed ManageIQ using the docker method mentioned here:
https://www.manageiq.org/docs/get-started/docker

I attached ManageIQ to our VMware instance and to our Ansible Tower server.
Then I created a service dialog and a service item.
I'm able to deploy VMs from the service ui. I could see log output under Services Requests, Request Logs.
But nothing in the docker logs output.

My questions:

  1. how could I enable automation log output to docker logs
  2. how could I enable debug output for automation tasks
@kbrock
Copy link
Member

kbrock commented May 24, 2023

related to ManageIQ/manageiq-content#730

@Fryguy
Copy link
Member

Fryguy commented May 26, 2023

As commented in ManageIQ/manageiq-content#730 (comment)

@BrGitHub11 In containerized deployments the logs get written to stdout and are not written to disk (journalctl doesn't exist in containers). That page should be hidden in containerized deployments, so if that's showing that's a bug. You should enable a log aggregator such as an EFK stack if running in a containerized deployment.

@Fryguy
Copy link
Member

Fryguy commented May 26, 2023

All logs should be written to STDOUT, so if they are not all there that is probably a bug.

@BrGitHub11
Copy link
Author

Hi Jason,
I'm looking at the docker logs output which should capture the STDOUT of the container. I could see other outputs of ManageIQ but no automation log output.

@Fryguy Fryguy transferred this issue from ManageIQ/manageiq-content Jun 7, 2023
@Fryguy
Copy link
Member

Fryguy commented Jun 7, 2023

Sounds like an issue with logging + a check for whether it's kube vs docker vs appliance.

@BrGitHub11
Copy link
Author

Were you able to reproduce the issue?

@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Sep 25, 2023
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Sep 25, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the triage process documentation.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jan 1, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

2 similar comments
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Apr 8, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jul 15, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

@jrafanie jrafanie removed the stale label Jul 24, 2024
@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Nov 1, 2024
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Nov 1, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

1 similar comment
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Feb 3, 2025

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants