Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

[1LP][RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones #9957

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2020
Merged

[1LP][RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones #9957

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2020

Conversation

tpapaioa
Copy link
Contributor

@tpapaioa tpapaioa commented Feb 28, 2020

Add test coverage for BZ:

Bug 1470283 - zones of sub region show up as zones appliances of a central region can move to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470283

{{ pytest: --long-running -v cfme/tests/distributed/test_appliance_replication.py::test_appliance_replicate_zones }}

@tpapaioa tpapaioa changed the title [WIPTEST] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones [RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones Mar 4, 2020
@dajoRH dajoRH removed the WIP-testing label Mar 4, 2020
@john-dupuy john-dupuy added the test-automation To be applied on PR's which are automating existing manual cases label Mar 12, 2020
@john-dupuy john-dupuy changed the title [RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones [1LP][RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones Mar 12, 2020
@dajoRH dajoRH changed the title [1LP][RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones [1LP][WIP] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones Mar 12, 2020
@tpapaioa tpapaioa changed the title [1LP][WIP] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones [1LP][WIPTEST] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones Mar 12, 2020
@tpapaioa tpapaioa changed the title [1LP][WIPTEST] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones [1LP][RFR] Automate test_appliance_replicate_zones Mar 12, 2020
@mshriver mshriver self-assigned this Mar 13, 2020
@mshriver mshriver merged commit 0ab09a0 into ManageIQ:master Mar 13, 2020
@tpapaioa tpapaioa deleted the test_replication_zones branch March 13, 2020 14:59
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lint-ok test-automation To be applied on PR's which are automating existing manual cases
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants