This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
[1LP][RFR]Fixing the TC test_cancel_migration_attachments #9900
Merged
digitronik
merged 1 commit into
ManageIQ:master
from
mnadeem92:fix_test_cancel_migration_attachments
Feb 7, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm suspect about this check.
why soft_assert?
are we expect that VM on
Openstack/rhevm
provider? if yes, why negation in an assertion?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, we are not expecting VM at destination.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The TC gets failed if VM gets migrated to Destination, However for OSP the port and volumes gets attached to the VM once it gets migrated , So for OSP, we need to do additional check for port and volumes if VM gets migrated to Destination.