We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There seems to be a discrepancy between the number of visit_details records that map to visit_detail_concept_id = 32037 versus that number of unique icustay_ids in the native MIMIC database. In MIMIC-OMOP, the relevant query pulls 71570 rows (https://github.com/MIT-LCP/mimic-omop/tree/master/etl/StandardizedClinicalDataTables/VISIT_DETAIL), but there are only 61,532 unique rows in ICUSTAYS.
This may be consistent with the way that the ETL is constructed, but it seems misleading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am looking into the check ETL code. It uses pgTAP.
Do you want to add this check to pgTAP? Also, unmapped data scripts are here
https://framagit.org/aphp/mimic-omop-article/-/tree/master/extras
and btw a nice diagram
https://framagit.org/aphp/mimic-omop-article/-/blob/master/extras/schema/sankey_diagram/MIMIC-OMOP_equivalence.png
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There seems to be a discrepancy between the number of visit_details records that map to visit_detail_concept_id = 32037 versus that number of unique icustay_ids in the native MIMIC database. In MIMIC-OMOP, the relevant query pulls 71570 rows (https://github.com/MIT-LCP/mimic-omop/tree/master/etl/StandardizedClinicalDataTables/VISIT_DETAIL), but there are only 61,532 unique rows in ICUSTAYS.
This may be consistent with the way that the ETL is constructed, but it seems misleading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: