Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Finalize fMRIPrep settings #28

Open
tsalo opened this issue Oct 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Finalize fMRIPrep settings #28

tsalo opened this issue Oct 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Oct 21, 2023

I'm planning to use version 23.1.5 (once it's released), since it has some nice CIFTI improvements.

Here are my planned settings:

--output-spaces func:res-native T1w:res-native MNI152NLin6Asym:res-2
--output-layout bids
--level full
--me-t2s-fit-method curvefit
--me-output-echos
--project-goodvoxels
--cifti-output
--slice-time-ref 0  # this should simplify the analysis for task data
--return-all-components
--random-seed 0

Is it worth it to include --use-aroma? Might be nice to have AROMA outputs to compare to tedana.

@tsalo tsalo added the question Further information is requested label Oct 21, 2023
@handwerkerd
Copy link
Member

I think AROMA would mostly be useful if we could use the same ICA mixing matrix for AROMA & tedana. If they use different ICAs, then it would be hard to do useful comparisions.

@tsalo
Copy link
Member Author

tsalo commented Oct 23, 2023

It seems possible to use the same mixing matrix for both. It's not something anyone's done yet AFAIK.

@tsalo
Copy link
Member Author

tsalo commented Oct 23, 2023

Actually I just remembered that AROMA was removed from fMRIPrep. I'll have to wait until fmripost-aroma is working, but that might be a useful additional derivative set once it's up and running.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants