You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 15, 2019. It is now read-only.
When I scroll down the list of delegates, all delegates after place 101 have uptime shown as 0% - e.g. isabella at place 124. So when I filter the list by typing e.g. 'isab' in the search field, I'd expect to also see 0% uptime.
Actual behaviour
When filtering, isabella is shown as having 98.89% uptime.
Steps to reproduce
It's pretty random, sometimes it shows as 0% and sometimes as 98.89%. I think the rule is that if you don't scroll down the list and just start filtering, the delegates beyond 100 aren't loaded yet, and then isabella is shown with 98.89%. But if you first scroll down the list to load the places 100-200, and then scroll up and start filtering, the place 124 is already loaded, so it's shown with 0% uptime.
(v. 1.2.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Expected behaviour
When I scroll down the list of delegates, all delegates after place 101 have uptime shown as 0% - e.g. isabella at place 124. So when I filter the list by typing e.g. 'isab' in the search field, I'd expect to also see 0% uptime.
Actual behaviour
When filtering, isabella is shown as having 98.89% uptime.
Steps to reproduce
It's pretty random, sometimes it shows as 0% and sometimes as 98.89%. I think the rule is that if you don't scroll down the list and just start filtering, the delegates beyond 100 aren't loaded yet, and then isabella is shown with 98.89%. But if you first scroll down the list to load the places 100-200, and then scroll up and start filtering, the place 124 is already loaded, so it's shown with 0% uptime.
(v. 1.2.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: