Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Experiments for MAWPS-s #11

Open
allanj opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Experiments for MAWPS-s #11

allanj opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@allanj
Copy link

allanj commented Nov 9, 2021

Is the experiment for MAWPS-s using 5-fold as well? It seems yes to me as the paper reported.
I got around 85.4 accuracy on MAWPS using train/dev/test. Wondering if I'm correct here.
image

@LYH-YF
Copy link
Owner

LYH-YF commented Nov 9, 2021

yes, mawps-s is 5-fold setting.

@allanj
Copy link
Author

allanj commented Nov 9, 2021

Thanks. Am I right that, for SVAMP, you are just directly doing train and test following the SVAMP paper?

@LYH-YF
Copy link
Owner

LYH-YF commented Nov 10, 2021

SVAMP is just a dataset for test, according to SVAMP paper, trainset consists of mawps and asdiv-a. And the setting is train-test split.running it with k-fold cross validation may not a good idea.

@allanj
Copy link
Author

allanj commented Nov 10, 2021

Got it. Maybe should specify them in the table/paper?

From the table, it seems only those marked with "*" are train-test split.

@allanj
Copy link
Author

allanj commented Nov 12, 2021

In the SVAMP paper, the appendix A show that the transformers with Roberta encoder obtain 38.9 accuracy
image

But it seems the RobertaGen only get 30.3 here. Curious about the difference here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants