Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the ingress-gateway ns really necessary? #132

Closed
kevprice83 opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Is the ingress-gateway ns really necessary? #132

kevprice83 opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@kevprice83
Copy link

It seems the ingress-gateway ns created in this part of the guide is not used anywhere.

It states that it would be for the DNS configuration but that is done as part of this guide, it seems like it's possibly redundant and was just referring to a generic namespace where the gateway was intended to be deployed.

I think we can remove it right?

@david-martin
Copy link
Member

TLDR:

A few things on this issue.

The docs for the linked version, 0.8.0, have been removed from the docs site, so the 2 links in the issue description give a 404.
I'd like to say that's less likely to happen since the 1.0 release, but I also like to have something more concrete on that. I plan on continuing that thread in #170 (comment)

A later version of those docs is available for 0.11.0 and 1.0.x (for the first one) at this time:

In 1.0.x, the 2nd guide has split into 2 guides, for kubernetes and openshift:

However, on main/dev (what will be the version after 1.0),
things have changed again.
There are new Install with Helm and Install with OLM guides,
and the follow on "Secure, protect, connect" doc has been merged into 1 version that can be followed for both kubernetes and openshift.

In the latest version of these install guides, the user is no longer instructed to create the ingress-gateway namespace, so I'm going to close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants