@param on Java classes is ignored

[IgnatBeresnev]

Background

The @param Javadoc tag can be used on classes to annotate type parameters. Example:

/**
 * a class
 *
 * @param <Bar> a bar
 * @param <Baz> a baz
 */
public class Foo<Bar extends String, Baz extends String> implements java.util.Map<Bar, Baz> {
    ...
}

Expected behaviour

The tag and value are not ignored and are both present in the documentable model and in the rendered documentation.

Actual behaviour

Dokka seems to be ignoring this case altogether.

Regression

Looks like it worked in Dokka 1.8.20, but it doesn't work in Dokka 1.9.0 anymore. Possibly, due to changes in #3034.

Dokka 1.8.20

Dokka 1.9.0

Notes

For type parameters, @param <Bar> seems to be the correct way to use it (surrounded with < and >), whereas @param Bar is highlighted in red by IDEA and it's ignored by the native javadoc format. Previously, both variants worked in Dokka 1.8.20, but it's only expected that the first one should work.

---

Related to: #3112