-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
site name not unique #135
Comments
I need to abandon sitename as a unique key. For BCC trees, we already have BCCsitecode but there is no equivalent for the other 'owners' Check all non BCC sites and use sitecode = sitename if unique, otherwise add prefix. This also solves problem of nonURl compatible names |
all BCC sites now have a BCC code |
some sites were missing a BCCsite code now added |
Lots of work done to move to sitecode but site(name) still embedded in linkage cleanup redundant site/code |
site list needs deduping now that we can see all the sites in a list the treecount caching for sites has been rerun- util/cache-site-treecount.xq |
tree editor has fields for sitenames which need to be replaced by sitecodes add tree on sitecode not implemented |
sitecodes seem to be buggered up - lots of sites have codes different from the BCC site codes - bulk change to replace sitecode with BCCsite code has crashed leaving data in a mess |
restarted the server since cant terminate that update - seems to be some confusion in the data and I may have made it worse - eg http://bristoltrees.space/Tree/tree/BCC-88904 has a BCC sitecode of WALLSA but the rest of the trees in that area have a site code of 4526621 |
creating a list of BCCcodes and the aliased sitecode - no idea why they are not unique but conversion to the normalised code being done on input |
I've been using site name as a unique site identifier but its not quite
For example, we have two high streets which need distinguishing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: