Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming to match the context #8

Open
naturallymitchell opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Naming to match the context #8

naturallymitchell opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@naturallymitchell
Copy link

toml and yaml both end in ml and have a vowel preceding it.

caml or coml seem like good names. I like caml. 🐫

@Keats
Copy link
Owner

Keats commented Sep 30, 2018

the ml part means markup language though, this is meant to be a configuration language only, hence the cl

@naturallymitchell
Copy link
Author

what's the difference between a markup language and a configuration language?

@Keats
Copy link
Owner

Keats commented Sep 30, 2018

Markup language can be used to mean many things: HTML is one for example. cl is not new, see: https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl

@naturallymitchell
Copy link
Author

naturallymitchell commented Sep 30, 2018

I believe the unifying operative theme with them is that they're human friendly, structured data formats.

For example, HCL says their configuration language format is designed to be both human writable, as well as machine readable.

JSON is the common denominator as a reference language it seems, eg HCL's compatibility with it and as the most common API language. And a definition I found for JSON is "a standard text-based format for representing structured data based on JavaScript object syntax".

Would you be open to using a name like KSDF? (Keats' Structured Data Format)

@Keats
Copy link
Owner

Keats commented Sep 30, 2018

To be honest I quite like SCL so I'm unlikely to change it. SDF means homeless people in French and looking at https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/intro-structured-data#structured-data-format is not really the same

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants