fix: backend returns 204 against Camel Route JSON with script step

[igarashitm]

Fixes: #529

This makes

We'd want a script step extension with the syntax selector.

[igarashitm]

wait, I'll strip the unnecessary icon from the JSON

[igarashitm]

That didn't help much to make test JSON file smaller. Pity.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #540 (b4d58bc) into main (ff4e484) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head b4d58bc differs from pull request most recent head 63d6e14. Consider uploading reports for the commit 63d6e14 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #540      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     78.96%   78.81%   -0.15%     
  Complexity      132      132              
============================================
  Files            45       45              
  Lines          2244     2247       +3     
  Branches        336      336              
============================================
- Hits           1772     1771       -1     
+ Misses          318      316       -2     
- Partials        154      160       +6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../step/parser/kamelet/KameletStepParserService.java	73.28% <100.00%> (-0.37%)	⬇️
...arser/step/camelroute/CamelRouteFileProcessor.java	94.52% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
...data/parser/step/kamelet/KameletFileProcessor.java	80.26% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.5% Duplication

[igarashitm]

On hold, can't add script from source code editor, seems not enough

[lhein]

Why is that issue being closed? Isn't it important any more?

[igarashitm]

@lhein The issue #529 is still open. This is a pull requset and turned out the fix has to address more.