We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Running the CQELS engine with a query that requires a BIND drastically reduces performance. For example, the query:
CONSTRUCT { [] ?p ?o . } WHERE { STREAM <http://example.org/stream> [RANGE 1s] { ?s ?p ?o . } }
is many times faster than:
CONSTRUCT { ?bnode ?p ?o . } WHERE { STREAM <http://example.org/stream> [RANGE 1s] { ?s ?p ?o . } BIND(BNODE() AS ?bnode) }
In my particualr use-case the latter form introduced an extra 250-350 ms delay per result. Is there an explanation for why BIND is so slow?
Also, the first query seems to reuse the same blank node for all evaluations: is this the expected behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Running the CQELS engine with a query that requires a BIND drastically reduces performance. For example, the query:
is many times faster than:
In my particualr use-case the latter form introduced an extra 250-350 ms delay per result. Is there an explanation for why BIND is so slow?
Also, the first query seems to reuse the same blank node for all evaluations: is this the expected behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: