Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve landing page #58

Open
4 of 6 tasks
orzechow opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
4 of 6 tasks

Improve landing page #58

orzechow opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@orzechow
Copy link
Member

orzechow commented Oct 11, 2024

After

we should improve our landing page.

  • Add a early section arbitrators in a nutshell explaining the awesomeness of arbitrators, why/when to use them, etc.
  • Update docker section → point to our ghcr.io image
  • Acknowledge contributors
  • Point to paper / how to cite
  • Add more shields
  • …?
@orzechow orzechow self-assigned this Oct 11, 2024
@orzechow
Copy link
Member Author

@ll-nick FYI

@orzechow orzechow closed this as completed Nov 4, 2024
@orzechow orzechow reopened this Nov 5, 2024
@orzechow
Copy link
Member Author

Add more shields

@ll-nick Thanks for #74

As you mentioned, code-coverage would be nice as well.
I guess integration of e.g. codecov.io (see quickstart docs) isn't big of a thing, feels a bit overkill though…
A simple coverage report can be generated by CTest as well. But we'd have to then somehow provide this report as e.g. json to generate a dynamic shield 😅

@ll-nick
Copy link
Collaborator

ll-nick commented Nov 19, 2024

Yes, I'd also like to have code coverage 🤔
I guess a relatively simple way would be to compute the code coverage with ctest and provide a code coverage report as a release asset. The downside would of course be that we can't use code coverage metrics on other branches or as a quality measure when adding new PRs but for a shield.io badge, it would be sufficient.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants