Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding auto botName suggestion when using .. range #1623

Open
5 tasks done
SENPAY98K opened this issue Jan 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
5 tasks done

Adding auto botName suggestion when using .. range #1623

SENPAY98K opened this issue Jan 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. 👍 PR-ok Issues marked with this label are good candidates for being accepted in a pull request.

Comments

@SENPAY98K
Copy link

Checklist

  • I read and understood ASF-ui's Contributing Guidelines
  • I also read FAQ
  • My idea doesn't duplicate existing ASF-ui functionality described on the wiki
  • I believe that my idea falls into ASF-ui's scope and should be offered as part of ASF-ui built-in functionality
  • This is not ASF suggestion

Enhancement purpose

image
When using a range, the starting bot argument shows suggestion, but last bot argument does not show anything rather then the next (last) argument suggestion.

Solution

Something to detect the range indicators and show suggestion instead.

Why currently available solutions are not sufficient?

It's okay at the moment, but implementing the range suggestion would make more usefull.

Can you help us with this enhancement idea?

Somehow, I can test and offer feedback, but can't code

Additional info

No response
@SENPAY98K SENPAY98K added ✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🧐 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. labels Jan 7, 2023
@Aareksio
Copy link
Member

Aareksio commented Jan 7, 2023

Interesting idea

@MrBurrBurr MrBurrBurr added 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. 👍 PR-ok Issues marked with this label are good candidates for being accepted in a pull request. and removed 🧐 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. labels Dec 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. 👍 PR-ok Issues marked with this label are good candidates for being accepted in a pull request.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Aareksio @MrBurrBurr @SENPAY98K