Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Commands improvements #1605

Open
5 tasks done
Nuklon opened this issue Oct 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks done

Commands improvements #1605

Nuklon opened this issue Oct 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@MrBurrBurr
Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. 👍 PR-ok Issues marked with this label are good candidates for being accepted in a pull request.

Comments

@Nuklon
Copy link

Nuklon commented Oct 2, 2022

Checklist

  • I read and understood ASF-ui's Contributing Guidelines
  • I also read FAQ
  • My idea doesn't duplicate existing ASF-ui functionality described on the wiki
  • I believe that my idea falls into ASF-ui's scope and should be offered as part of ASF-ui built-in functionality
  • This is not ASF suggestion

Enhancement purpose

A couple of things to improve on.

  1. If there is no command enter, and you click on >, it would be helpful to show the possible commands (dropdown would be nice so when you click on a command it would add it to the input box; but a print for "commands" would work too).
  2. help commands don't always display full description, for example: help redeem^ only prints Redeems given cd-keys or wallet codes on given bot instances, using given modes explained below. There are no modes explained. This makes it kinda useless.

Solution

See enhancement purpose.

Why currently available solutions are not sufficient?

Doesn't exist yet.

Can you help us with this enhancement idea?

No, I don't have time, skills or willings for any of that

Additional info

No response
@Nuklon Nuklon added ✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🧐 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. labels Oct 2, 2022
@MrBurrBurr MrBurrBurr added 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. 👍 PR-ok Issues marked with this label are good candidates for being accepted in a pull request. and removed 🧐 Evaluation Issues marked with this label are currently being evaluated if they're going to be considered. labels Oct 2, 2022
@MrBurrBurr MrBurrBurr self-assigned this Oct 2, 2022
This was referenced Oct 2, 2022
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MrBurrBurr MrBurrBurr

Labels
✨ Enhancement Issues marked with this label indicate further enhancements to the program, such as new features. 🟢 Low priority Issues marked with this label are actively being worked on if nothing serious is on the list. 👍 PR-ok Issues marked with this label are good candidates for being accepted in a pull request.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Nuklon @MrBurrBurr