You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm recently working on the disambiguation feature of citeproc-lua and I come up with this test case. In the following fixture, both cites have original output "Doe, Roe" and disambiguation is required. Since only the second names are different ("Jane Roe" and "Jack Roe"), they are expanded to long form according to the disambiguation rule. The output is expected to be "Doe, Jane Roe; Doe, Jack Roe". However citeproc-jsf56f8c9 produces "Doe, Roe; Doe, Roe" in which the second names are not disambiguated.
+ expected - actual
-Doe, Roe; Doe, Roe
+Doe, Jane Roe; Doe, Jack Roe
Good catch on this, thank you for this report. I've confirmed the bug and I'm working on a fix. Kind of surprised and embarrassed that we didn't catch this straightforward failure earlier!
I'm recently working on the disambiguation feature of
citeproc-lua
and I come up with this test case. In the following fixture, both cites have original output "Doe, Roe" and disambiguation is required. Since only the second names are different ("Jane Roe" and "Jack Roe"), they are expanded tolong
form according to the disambiguation rule. The output is expected to be "Doe, Jane Roe; Doe, Jack Roe". Howeverciteproc-js
f56f8c9 produces "Doe, Roe; Doe, Roe" in which the second names are not disambiguated.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: