[JOSS] References

[HaoZeke]

Hi,
Very minor issue brought up by @whedon here, openjournals/joss-reviews#1700 (comment)

Would be happy to close once it has been addressed.

[akabla]

Thanks so much Rohit @HaoZeke for checking.
Whedon is actually picking up a review of the book, and not the book itself. I can't find a doi for the book, and I'm not sure there is one. We'll look again.

[moustachio-belvedere]

Thanks for noting that @HaoZeke. Indeed, as @akabla mentioned, I can confirm that the DOI is a review of the book.

I did not notice it was a review at first and added in the DOI to the reference but Whedon still did not accept it so I looked a bit more closely. (This was during the pre-review openjournals/joss-reviews#1681 , commit 331db27 added it and then commit 3409c4a removed it once I had realised). I should have realised before as it is unusual for a book to have a DOI as far as I understand.

I will close the issue for now but please do let us know if you have any further queries on that.

Thanks again

edit: also worth noting that the paper.bib file has the full ISBN number for that book

[HaoZeke]

An thanks for clearing this up! Sorry I hadn't noticed it in the pre review.

[moustachio-belvedere]

No worries at all,