You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now DArray is both the notion of where and the data. I propose to factor out the where into it's own Partitons type, so that we can have a type-hierarchy of partitions, from generic n-dim hypercubes, to partitionings that are only distributed across one axes, to block cyclic or cartesian partitioning.
One important improvement would be that a process can hold more than one chunk and that the chunk array type can be heterogeneous across the DArray allowing us to mix something like a FillArray in and represent
block sparsity more efficiently.
Partitions should support reasoning about moving data from A to B, including this data is local (even though it is a different chunk).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now
DArray
is both the notion of where and the data. I propose to factor out the where into it's own Partitons type, so that we can have a type-hierarchy of partitions, from generic n-dim hypercubes, to partitionings that are only distributed across one axes, to block cyclic or cartesian partitioning.One important improvement would be that a process can hold more than one chunk and that the chunk array type can be heterogeneous across the
DArray
allowing us to mix something like a FillArray in and representblock sparsity more efficiently.
Partitions should support reasoning about moving data from A to B, including this data is local (even though it is a different chunk).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: