Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to JuliaMath? #12

Closed
jiahao opened this issue Sep 28, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Move to JuliaMath? #12

jiahao opened this issue Sep 28, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@jiahao
Copy link
Contributor

jiahao commented Sep 28, 2016

@JuliaMath

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Contributor

I think it would be a good idea. I didn't know that this existed until I went on a package searching spree. Although it's not integrated with the other packages right now, I think the real power of this package will come from putting special dispatches on these types to use with things like IterativeSolvers.jl (for matrix-free methods), in which case the integration will definitely warrant the move.

@ivanslapnicar
Copy link
Contributor

It is exactly where the power lies. Check the notebook for an example of using Hankel() type, fast multiply via fft, and LinearMaps.jl to compute 40 eigenvalues of a 50001x50001 matrix in 6-7 seconds.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Contributor

I think it would be a good idea to migrate, since it would help others join in maintenance to do things like #15.

@simonbyrne
Copy link

Let's do it: @jiahao you should already have the appropriate privileges.

@jiahao
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiahao commented Aug 22, 2017

Well, we didn't exactly end up in JuliaMath, but JuliaMatrices is also a good home.

@jiahao jiahao closed this as completed Aug 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants