You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we set the trait FiveArg(), is it also necessary to implement the three argument mul!? Something like:
LinearMaps.MulStyle(A::MyMap) = FiveArg()
function LinearMaps._unsafe_mul!(y, A::MyMap, x::AbstractVector, α, β)
...
end
LinearMaps._unsafe_mul!(y, A::MyMap, x::AbstractVector) = LinearMaps._unsafe_mul!(y, A, x, 1, 0)
If so, it would be useful to note this in the "Custom Maps" section of the documentation.
If you don't need to do this then I have some other issue... :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for my slow response. That's a good question, I haven't looked things in here for quite a while. It seems that within this package, even the FiveArg() types have the three-arg _unsafe_mul! defined, but that may be "by tradition" or "by necessity". I think we introduced it to indicate whether or not one can do multiply-and-add in-place, without allocating the intermediate multiplication result. I never thought about it in terms of "saving" the three-arg method.
If we set the trait FiveArg(), is it also necessary to implement the three argument
mul!
? Something like:If so, it would be useful to note this in the "Custom Maps" section of the documentation.
If you don't need to do this then I have some other issue... :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: