-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Similar package based on sPOT #168
Comments
Thanks for reaching out. I see the documentation is overwhelmingly extensive. Do you have some ideas where collaboration/consolidation could be beneficial? |
Thanks indeed from my side as well; it is indeed surprising that we did not learn from each other's existence earlier. Just as a historical aside, development of LinearMaps.jl actually started in 2014 using Julia v0.3: https://github.com/JuliaLinearAlgebra/LinearMaps.jl/tree/v0.0.1 |
Thanks for getting back. And nice to meet you of course.
Wow we completely missed that, would have been a good idea to notice then and make things more uniform/compatible.
Top of my head, not really. I am still trying to wrap my head around similarities and differences to see what a good starting point would be and which parts could be beneficial to each other. If the two packages turn out to be too different then we'll see I just thought it could be a good opportunity to look into it. |
Would also like to say that I really like the way you handle composition of linear maps, seems very flexible and extendable to new Maps. |
Hello
We just ran into this package and it looks like there is quite the overlap (and differences) with a package we have been developing since julia v0.5. Our research group I(SLIM @ gatech, https://github.com/slimgroup) was heavily involved with
SPOT
that you mention in the documentation, includingpSPOT
a distributed extension.Our package is called JOLI.jl and we think there is room for collaboration/combination to maybe get the best of both worlds. Some design principles are slightly different and may need some rethink but it may be beneficial in the long term.
cheers
@henryk-modzelewski, @ziyiyin97 if you have some more to say.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: