Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Similar package based on sPOT #168

Closed
mloubout opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Similar package based on sPOT #168

mloubout opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@mloubout
Copy link
Contributor

mloubout commented Feb 9, 2022

Hello

We just ran into this package and it looks like there is quite the overlap (and differences) with a package we have been developing since julia v0.5. Our research group I(SLIM @ gatech, https://github.com/slimgroup) was heavily involved with SPOT that you mention in the documentation, including pSPOT a distributed extension.

Our package is called JOLI.jl and we think there is room for collaboration/combination to maybe get the best of both worlds. Some design principles are slightly different and may need some rethink but it may be beneficial in the long term.

cheers

@henryk-modzelewski, @ziyiyin97 if you have some more to say.

@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reaching out. I see the documentation is overwhelmingly extensive. Do you have some ideas where collaboration/consolidation could be beneficial?

@Jutho
Copy link
Collaborator

Jutho commented Feb 28, 2022

Thanks indeed from my side as well; it is indeed surprising that we did not learn from each other's existence earlier. Just as a historical aside, development of LinearMaps.jl actually started in 2014 using Julia v0.3: https://github.com/JuliaLinearAlgebra/LinearMaps.jl/tree/v0.0.1

@mloubout
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for getting back. And nice to meet you of course.

actually started in 2014

Wow we completely missed that, would have been a good idea to notice then and make things more uniform/compatible.

Do you have some ideas where collaboration/consolidation could be beneficial?

Top of my head, not really. I am still trying to wrap my head around similarities and differences to see what a good starting point would be and which parts could be beneficial to each other. If the two packages turn out to be too different then we'll see I just thought it could be a good opportunity to look into it.

@mloubout
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would also like to say that I really like the way you handle composition of linear maps, seems very flexible and extendable to new Maps.

@mloubout mloubout closed this as completed Jan 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants