Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize aliasing detection for isbits arrays #29854

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2018
Merged

Conversation

mbauman
Copy link
Member

@mbauman mbauman commented Oct 30, 2018

Simple fix until we get the better comprehensive solution for dataids at #26237

Simple fix until we get the better comprehensive solution for dataids at #26237
@mbauman
Copy link
Member Author

mbauman commented Oct 30, 2018

This will have the same performance impacts as JuliaDiff/ForwardDiff.jl#374

@KristofferC KristofferC added performance Must go faster arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] labels Oct 30, 2018
@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented Oct 30, 2018

isbits objects inherently can't alias, so lgtm

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented Nov 1, 2018

Would this get reflected on nanosoldier?

@mbauman
Copy link
Member Author

mbauman commented Nov 1, 2018

I don't think so — we didn't have any back when I implemented aliasing detection in the first place.

@mbauman mbauman merged commit 636f5ad into master Nov 2, 2018
@mbauman mbauman deleted the mb/aliasingperfhack branch November 2, 2018 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arrays [a, r, r, a, y, s] performance Must go faster
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants