Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release 0.5] hack in a fix to getting the right lambda for the incremental deserializer #18452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2016

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Sep 12, 2016

fix #18449
(the real, non-buggy fix is in #18413 for v0.6-dev master)

…lizer

fix #18449
(the real, non-buggy fix is in #18413 for v0.6-dev master)
@tkelman tkelman added the needs tests Unit tests are required for this change label Sep 12, 2016
@yuyichao
Copy link
Contributor

Note that #18449 does not trigger on 0.5.

@ViralBShah ViralBShah modified the milestones: 0.5.0, 0.5.x Sep 12, 2016
@vtjnash
Copy link
Member Author

vtjnash commented Sep 12, 2016

oh, I guess this also needs #18415 backported first too

@tkelman tkelman changed the base branch from release-0.5 to tk/backports-0.5.0 September 17, 2016 06:33
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Sep 17, 2016

can you add a test? I saw this error on gadfly and mamba in #18546, will upload logs soon

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Sep 17, 2016

Old travis logs backed up to

and restarted. May need to merge this into tk/backports-0.5.0 before @vtjnash (or @yuyichao?) wakes up and can identify if there's already an appropriate test for this on master or if a new one needs to be written. We'll still need a test for release-0.5 but I won't block starting my next pkgeval run on it.

@tkelman tkelman merged commit aad3046 into tk/backports-0.5.0 Sep 17, 2016
@tkelman tkelman deleted the jn/18449 branch September 17, 2016 11:51
@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Sep 17, 2016

Master needs the test too, so we'll do that in a new PR and backport whenever it's ready.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs tests Unit tests are required for this change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants