Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@time reports greater than 100% compilation time on v1.9.0-beta2 #48155

Closed
jishnub opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

@time reports greater than 100% compilation time on v1.9.0-beta2 #48155

jishnub opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jishnub
Copy link
Contributor

jishnub commented Jan 6, 2023

This is on v1.9.0-beta2, so the fix in #41286 doesn't seem to apply to this.
In a fresh session, I run

julia> @time @eval sin.(zeros(10, 10));
  0.200751 seconds (280.38 k allocations: 18.425 MiB, 130.97% compilation time)

julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.9.0-beta2
Commit 7daffeecb8c (2022-12-29 07:45 UTC)
Platform Info:
  OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
  CPU: 8 × 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-14.0.6 (ORCJIT, tigerlake)
  Threads: 1 on 8 virtual cores
Environment:
  LD_LIBRARY_PATH = :/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-3.0/modules
  JULIA_EDITOR = subl

On v1.8.4, I obtain

julia> @time @eval sin.(zeros(10, 10));
  0.183622 seconds (593.69 k allocations: 30.280 MiB, 95.88% compilation time)

so this seems like a regression.

@giordano
Copy link
Contributor

giordano commented Jan 6, 2023

Probably duplicate of #48024, fixed by #48033, it'd be useful to test on master

@jishnub
Copy link
Contributor Author

jishnub commented Jan 6, 2023

Indeed, seems fixed on nightly. I'll close this, as this should be fixed on beta3.

@jishnub jishnub closed this as completed Jan 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants