We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@time
This is on v1.9.0-beta2, so the fix in #41286 doesn't seem to apply to this. In a fresh session, I run
julia> @time @eval sin.(zeros(10, 10)); 0.200751 seconds (280.38 k allocations: 18.425 MiB, 130.97% compilation time) julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 1.9.0-beta2 Commit 7daffeecb8c (2022-12-29 07:45 UTC) Platform Info: OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu) CPU: 8 × 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 LIBM: libopenlibm LLVM: libLLVM-14.0.6 (ORCJIT, tigerlake) Threads: 1 on 8 virtual cores Environment: LD_LIBRARY_PATH = :/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-3.0/modules JULIA_EDITOR = subl
On v1.8.4, I obtain
julia> @time @eval sin.(zeros(10, 10)); 0.183622 seconds (593.69 k allocations: 30.280 MiB, 95.88% compilation time)
so this seems like a regression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably duplicate of #48024, fixed by #48033, it'd be useful to test on master
Sorry, something went wrong.
Indeed, seems fixed on nightly. I'll close this, as this should be fixed on beta3.
No branches or pull requests
This is on v1.9.0-beta2, so the fix in #41286 doesn't seem to apply to this.
In a fresh session, I run
On v1.8.4, I obtain
so this seems like a regression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: