You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are in the process of generalizing some code from scalar fields to vector spaces, and some algorithms that use * can be rewritten in terms of ⋅ (LinearAlgebra.dot). These algorithms support missing values in the scalar case because missing * missing is implemented in Base. Can we also have a dot(::Missing, ::Missing) = missing in the next release of the language?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are in the process of generalizing some code from scalar fields to vector spaces, and some algorithms that use
*
can be rewritten in terms of⋅
(LinearAlgebra.dot). These algorithms supportmissing
values in the scalar case becausemissing * missing
is implemented inBase
. Can we also have adot(::Missing, ::Missing) = missing
in the next release of the language?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: