Add !=(2) to parallel ==(2)

[cstjean]

The ==(2) method is a convenient replacement of x->x==2. Could we also have !=(2)?

EDIT: isa(Vector) and ===(2) would be nice, too.

[ronisbr]

I suppose that we cannot define this for the other types of comparisons like >= or <= right?

[JeffBezanson]

Sure we can. It just gets a bit confusing, since in <(2) it might not be clear whether the 2 is the left or right argument.

[StefanKarpinski]

The convention we decided on is that we do this kind of "auto-currying" for

predicate(subject, object)

functions taking two arguments and the curried form is

subject -> predicate(subject, object)

So in(collection) means

item -> item in collection

By that rule <(b) means a -> a < b which makes sense since you read it as "less than b".

[cstjean]

Fixed by #30915