Our DWARF info makes no sense

[Keno]

I thought I had filed an issue for this already, but I can't find it. There's a big problem with the DWARF we generated for inlined code. Right now what we're describing is a function inlined into itself, but at a different location and a different file. We need to clean up the scopes we use when generating the debug info.

[vtjnash]

I think this will be fixed by #14949 once is merged. IIUC, that is blocked on Jeff figuring out #15000.

[StefanKarpinski]

I'm a little confused, @vtjnash – #15000 is closed, what needs to be figured out?

[carnaval]

#15000 is not really necessary, only nice to have as it would avoid some duplication of information. #1494 is in need of a good cleanup though, will do that today.

[JeffBezanson]

@Keno can you confirm whether this is fixed?

[Keno]

I'll take a look later and see if there are remaining issues.

[KristofferC]

@Keno Did you find anything?

[KristofferC]

Bump @Keno, how are the dwarfs doing?

[StefanKarpinski]

They seem pretty jolly as a whole.

[vtjnash]

Closing, since no response from OP