-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Macros and docstrings #12782
Comments
Dup of #12705. |
I think for types, making the type as the return value of the expression should work (at least it used to). Otherwise dup of the other issue. |
No, that doesn't work anymore:
|
OK. Yeah I haven't been following the discussion there and haven't update my julia for two weeks now ;-p... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have some macros that generate types and a few constructors for it. Right now this fails because the doc macro expects a single structure and I don't see a good way to document the type generated by the macro. Would it be reasonable to have docstrings on a block document the first thing in the block. Extremely simplified example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: