Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

k'th diagonal version of diag missing for Diagonal #164

Closed
jakebolewski opened this issue Feb 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

k'th diagonal version of diag missing for Diagonal #164

jakebolewski opened this issue Feb 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jakebolewski
Copy link
Member

julia> d = Diagonal(rand(5,5))
5x5 Base.LinAlg.Diagonal{Float64}:
 0.670529  0.0       0.0       0.0       0.0
 0.0       0.755698  0.0       0.0       0.0
 0.0       0.0       0.993278  0.0       0.0
 0.0       0.0       0.0       0.155609  0.0
 0.0       0.0       0.0       0.0       0.224386

julia> diag(d)
5-element Array{Float64,1}:
 0.670529
 0.755698
 0.993278
 0.155609
 0.224386

julia> diag(d,1)
ERROR: MethodError: `similar` has no method matching similar(::Base.LinAlg.Diagonal{Float64}, ::Type{Float64}, ::(Int64,))
@jakebolewski jakebolewski self-assigned this Feb 1, 2015
@jiahao
Copy link
Member

jiahao commented Feb 2, 2015

Again, I would prefer to see this issue resolved as part of subsuming Diagonal, Bidiagonal, SymTridiagonal and Tridiagonal into a general Banded matrix format as proposed in JuliaLang/julia#8240

@jakebolewski
Copy link
Member Author

diag is also currently not defined for Symmetric or Hermitian.

This breaks trace for these matrix types as well.

@mbauman
Copy link
Member

mbauman commented Jun 12, 2015

Fixed by JuliaLang/julia#10525.

@KristofferC KristofferC transferred this issue from JuliaLang/julia Nov 26, 2024
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants