Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve mid and bisect #261

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 20, 2017
Merged

Improve mid and bisect #261

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 20, 2017

Conversation

dpsanders
Copy link
Member

@dpsanders dpsanders commented Mar 19, 2017

Fixes #243

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 19, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #261 into master will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #261      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.26%   90.31%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          26       26              
  Lines        1079     1084       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          974      979       +5     
  Misses        105      105
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/intervals/arithmetic.jl 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/root_finding/bisect.jl 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1c0b48f...82890f9. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 19, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 90.314% when pulling 82890f9 on improve_bisect into 1c0b48f on master.

@dpsanders
Copy link
Member Author

OK to merge @lbenet ?

@lbenet
Copy link
Member

lbenet commented Mar 20, 2017

Merging...

@lbenet lbenet merged commit ac8d0a8 into master Mar 20, 2017
@OlivierHnt OlivierHnt deleted the improve_bisect branch December 9, 2024 02:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants