We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There's a new, robust implementation of the projection onto the exponential cone detailed in this paper by Henrik Friberg.
This is implemented in MathOptSetDistances.jl. Happy to port over. https://github.com/matbesancon/MathOptSetDistances.jl/blob/1f3e578398ba91fbbcaf805aaf55f9105d858a40/src/projections.jl#L170
Relevant section of code:
ProximalOperators.jl/src/functions/indExp.jl
Line 79 in 7889da3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Very interesting! I think it would be nice to replace the current implementation. For reference, some test cases on this projection can be found here:
ProximalOperators.jl/test/test_results.jl
Line 196 in 7889da3
Sorry, something went wrong.
This could be the occasion to first add benchmarks for the projection on the exponential cone, so to “touch with hand” the performance improvement https://github.com/JuliaFirstOrder/ProximalOperators.jl/blob/master/benchmark/benchmarks.jl
Benchmarks being added in #126
No branches or pull requests
There's a new, robust implementation of the projection onto the exponential cone detailed in this paper by Henrik Friberg.
This is implemented in MathOptSetDistances.jl. Happy to port over.
https://github.com/matbesancon/MathOptSetDistances.jl/blob/1f3e578398ba91fbbcaf805aaf55f9105d858a40/src/projections.jl#L170
Relevant section of code:
ProximalOperators.jl/src/functions/indExp.jl
Line 79 in 7889da3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: