```@repl block inside !!! note doesn't show output

[shashi]

@repl block inside an !!! note is neither stylized as the REPL nor is the output shown. Is this intended?

[mortenpi]

Can confirm. Other special blocks seem to be ignored in admonitions as well. Thanks for the report!

[mortenpi]

I'm rather sure that the issue comes from src/Expanders.jl#L25-L32 -- the expander functions are only called on top-level blocks, and not recursively through the AST.

[nluetts]

I just stumbled upon the same problem---is it not resolved yet? Or is there a workaround?

[ettersi]

I'd really like to see this fixed, and I'm happy to give a hand doing so. However, since there have already been two attempts which seem to eventually have run out of steam, I thought I'd ask for some input first on what people think would be the best way to resolve this.

[KristofferC]

Is there anything wrong with #1747?

[ettersi]

Yes - it isn't merged yet! 😉 Other than that, I'm wondering the same.

[mortenpi]

#1747 contains some unnecessary changes as far as I can tell. But I think the general approach there is good (create a new expander step that recurses for certain elements, but only calls a subset of expander steps then). It needs to be updated to the new MarkdownAST-based tree though. @ettersi I'd say you're welcome to adopt that PR to finish it up if you'd like.

[ettersi]

What's the recommended way to "adopt" a PR? I believe I can't fork a PR. I can of course create a new PR, but that would erase @jmert from the history, which doesn't seem fair.

[mortenpi]

You'd have to start a new PR on your fork, but you can use their latest commit as a starting point (although, it might be easier to just re-do it from scratch, since merging with master might be more work at this point). One way or another, I'll make sure that there is a Co-Authored-By in the commit message when we merge.

[ettersi]

Done: #1970