We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I don't think the tests in https://github.com/JuliaDiff/SparseDiffTools.jl/blob/master/test/test_gpu_ad.jl verify correctness of the Jacobian, it's only about whether or not the code runs. Since #302 breaks GPU tests, it means the code path with the wrong indexing was taken by GPUs, so GPU Jacobians have probably been wrong all along.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rows_index
cols_index
There are SciMLSensitivity/DiffEqFlux downstream tests that would've required its accuracy.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I don't think the tests in https://github.com/JuliaDiff/SparseDiffTools.jl/blob/master/test/test_gpu_ad.jl verify correctness of the Jacobian, it's only about whether or not the code runs. Since #302 breaks GPU tests, it means the code path with the wrong indexing was taken by GPUs, so GPU Jacobians have probably been wrong all along.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: