You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to have a common high level interface to both the CLFFT and CUFFT libraries. They have many similarities (high cost of plan creation, similar feature set, overall api design, etc.) so there is bound to be significant overlap between the two. Making it easy to try out either library with minimal code changes would be worthwhile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that something common would be good. I seriously considered targeting OpenCL, but in my browsing I found evidence that clFFT wasn't ideal on NVIDIA hardware (which is what we own). I feel I have enough irons in various fires without embarking on submitting pull requests to the clFFT repository 😄.
Right now this is very bare-bones, and it doesn't even work with the driver API wrapper. Once the low-level stuff is working, then I agree, it would be great to think about a more common interface. It's only a handful of functions, really.
It would be nice to have a common high level interface to both the CLFFT and CUFFT libraries. They have many similarities (high cost of plan creation, similar feature set, overall api design, etc.) so there is bound to be significant overlap between the two. Making it easy to try out either library with minimal code changes would be worthwhile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: