JLayers docstring needs update

[Wikunia]

Currently the docstring of JLayer see: https://wikunia.github.io/Javis.jl/stable/references/#Javis.@JLayer-Tuple{Expr,Int64,Int64,Any,QuoteNode,Expr}
misses the transparent inside the function arguments and I think we should write :transparent and :opaque as code

The docstring of to_layer_m should also me updated and maybe we should call it _to_layer as it is an internal method that is normally not called by the user?

Maybe you @Sov-trotter can fix this 😉

[EnzioKam]

Just want to also point out that for the example in the docstring, the object is at red_ball = Object(20:60, (args...)->object(O, "red"), Point(50,0)) might be confusing, since there is no object function defined in the example.

Maybe consider replacing object with circle or other shapes, or adding the object function into the docstring's example itself?

[Wikunia]

Yes good point. I think we might want to use JCircle when possible to also remove the explicit anonymous functions everywhere

[Sov-trotter]

I think we might want to use JCircle when possible to also remove the explicit anonymous functions everywhere

@Wikunia I am not sure if I can agree on that one. This would present shorthands as mainstream Javis way of defining objects which is not good as shorthands are just an easy way of representing anonymous functions.

It's like giving a mathematical formula without deriving it. 😅

[Wikunia]

I think it makes sense to start with the anonymous functions in the tutorials as we do. However for docstrings it should be preferably be all possible without defining specific functions in each of them. Another option would be to use JShape to be more general as one doesn't really need the anonymous function anymore when one can use JShape.