You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I feel the docs for browser extension could really benefit from more structure. For example a sub-page for each operating system and then proper headlines for different browser configurations. Or a sub-page for each browser and then a proper headline for each operating system.
But right now the "Manual Installation for Chrome on Linux" is a mess to find far down in a listing:
I also feel that the twice-repeated call to download is not really a clear call to action and more confusing than it should be:
Lastly it should be more clear from the start that the installation takes three steps:
install browser extension
install native message handler
ensure that your jabrefHost.py or .bat is in the proper location
I have installed jabref browser extension on a linux system twice in last week, once for myself and once for a friend.
Unfortunately the documentation for the browser installation feels not very user friendly and confusing. Even at the second installation (and native host configuration) for jabref we had to take a deep look into the docs at https://docs.jabref.org/collect/jabref-browser-extension#installation-and-configuration
I feel the docs for browser extension could really benefit from more structure. For example a sub-page for each operating system and then proper headlines for different browser configurations. Or a sub-page for each browser and then a proper headline for each operating system.
But right now the "Manual Installation for Chrome on Linux" is a mess to find far down in a listing:
I also feel that the twice-repeated call to download is not really a clear call to action and more confusing than it should be:
Lastly it should be more clear from the start that the installation takes three steps:
I see from other docs such as https://docs.jabref.org/collect/import that further sub-categories are possible.
So I would like to ask you:
If we get a consensus on these questions I'm happy to contribute a PR.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: