Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"BibTeX field" to be replaced by ??? #315

Closed
mlep opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

"BibTeX field" to be replaced by ??? #315

mlep opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@mlep
Copy link
Contributor

mlep commented Oct 2, 2020

In the interface and in the help, "BibTeX field" is mentioned, while the field is not BibTeX specific (i.e. it could be a biblatex field too).
Here is an example from the group interface:
Capture du 2020-10-02 12-53-51

Like "bibtexkey" was replaced by "citationkey", I propose to replace "BibTeX field" and "biblatex field" (when the field is not specific to BibTeX or biblatex).
What would be a good replacement:

  • bibentry field?
  • bibliographic field?
  • entry field?
  • ...?
@mlep mlep added the question label Oct 2, 2020
@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

I would simply use "field" without any qualifier. In most cases, the distinction between bibtex and biblatex, and JabRef's bultin-fields (like groups, or entrytype) are not important.

In the above screenshot, one can simply write "Generate groups from keywords in the following field:"

@mlep
Copy link
Contributor Author

mlep commented Oct 5, 2020

@tobiasdiez OK, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants