Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Relevance Feedback #30

Open
michelole opened this issue Jul 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Relevance Feedback #30

michelole opened this issue Jul 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@michelole
Copy link
Collaborator

Try the classical Rocchio algorithm for relevance feedback.

Consider https://github.com/biocaddie/elasticsearch-queryexpansion-plugin

Follow-up of bst-mug/trec-2017-precision-medicine#87.
@khituras
Copy link
Member

But Rocchio is always interactive, isn't it? I know that there is also pseudo relevance feedback which would be fully automated. What are your thoughts regarding this?

@michelole
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rocchio is interactive, but there's no need to more than two rounds: we can play the user and judge the top-5 docs (as we already do when creating the internal GS).

PRF is also interesting, but might be a problem for topics with very few relevant documents.

@michelole michelole added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@michelole @khituras