Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion]: acquire slot or wait at depot / station #786

Open
CactusAcolyte opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Suggestion]: acquire slot or wait at depot / station #786

CactusAcolyte opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@CactusAcolyte
Copy link

CactusAcolyte commented Dec 5, 2024

image

Programable signals feature a whole host of modes of slot operation, including "Acquire or wait."

image

Vehicle orders allow aquiring and releasing slots without using signals easily enough, and conditional order jumps have various other in slot / not in slot / attempt aquiring slot modes, with the notable absence of any comparable aquire or wait option.

image

In order to get a vehicle to wait at depot (or station) until a slot is available without using signals, you have to resort to having it loop on a go-to order, which looks glitchy (albeit functional) unless the depot / station order has a wait added manually on the timetable.
I think this an intended use case.

If it doesn't require a coding rebase (feel free to close the issue if it does) I think having an optional action as part of the go-to order (akin to near-end or wait until full) or a "wait in place until slot is aquired" new order type would make it feel a little bit less hacky and obscure.

@Gadg8eer
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is a worthwhile issue to look at too, but then I'm still hoping JGR will pick up that old Shunting patch and I'm worried whether they would be compatible?

@CactusAcolyte
Copy link
Author

I think this is a worthwhile issue to look at too, but then I'm still hoping JGR will pick up that old Shunting patch and I'm worried whether they would be compatible?

what, this one?

where the linked forum thread was spawned 6 years ago and the linked repo hasn't seen movement since then?

i think you're right about compatibility because i'm not sure that patch would be compatible with anything today

i just want a slot option man

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants