Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect number of edges in specific case #22

Closed
archimedes4000 opened this issue Jul 20, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Incorrect number of edges in specific case #22

archimedes4000 opened this issue Jul 20, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@archimedes4000
Copy link

When using jc_voronoi for a natural neighbor interpolation problem, I was testing jc_voronoi to make sure it was getting linked correctly by giving it a square of points at {0,0}, {val, 0}, {0, val}, {-val, 0}, and {0, -val}.

There appears to be a bug when val = 2 in this case.
I went through and was checking the number of edges that each site said it had, and the {0,0} site is always supposed to say 4. When val = 2, it says it has two. This doesn't seem to happen when I rotate or shift the square. This code runs through these cases and some other vals other than 2

#define JC_VORONOI_IMPLEMENTATION
#include "jc_voronoi.h"
#include <cmath>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <iostream>

void printSquare( float val, int mode )
{
  std::cout << "\nStart Of Test\n";
  int pointCount = 5;
  jcv_point list[pointCount];
  // list[0] = {  0,   0 };

  if( mode == 1)
  {
    //45 degree rotation on unit circle
    list[0].x = 0;
    list[0].y = 0;
    float valUpdated = val/(std::sqrt(2));
    // list[1] = { valUpdated, valUpdated };
    list[1].x = valUpdated;
    list[1].y = valUpdated;
    // list[2] = { -valUpdated, valUpdated };
    list[2].x = -valUpdated;
    list[2].y = valUpdated;
    // list[3] = { valUpdated, -valUpdated };
    list[3].x = valUpdated;
    list[3].y = -valUpdated;
    // list[4] = { -valUpdated, -valUpdated };
    list[4].x = -valUpdated;
    list[4].y = -valUpdated;
  }else if ( mode == 2)
  {
    //offset from origin
    float xOffset = std::rand() % 100 + 1;
    float yOffset = std::rand() % 100 + 1;

    list[0].x = 0 + xOffset;
    list[0].y = 0 + yOffset;

    // list[1] = { val + xOffset , 0 + yOffset };
    list[1].x = val + xOffset;
    list[1].y = 0 + yOffset;
    // list[2] = { 0 + xOffset, val + yOffset  };
    list[2].x = 0 + xOffset;
    list[2].y = val + yOffset;
    // list[3] = { -val + xOffset, 0 + yOffset  };
    list[3].x = -val + xOffset;
    list[3].y = 0 + yOffset;
    // list[4] = { 0 + xOffset, -val + yOffset };
    list[4].x = 0 + xOffset;
    list[4].y = -val + yOffset;
  }else
  {
    list[0].x = 0;
    list[0].y = 0;
    // list[1] = { val, 0 };
    list[1].x = val;
    list[1].y = 0;
    // list[2] = { 0, val };
    list[2].x = 0;
    list[2].y = val;
    // list[3] = { -val, 0 };
    list[3].x = -val;
    list[3].y = 0;
    // list[4] = { 0, -val };
    list[4].x = 0;
    list[4].y = -val;
  }
  jcv_diagram diagram;
  memset(&diagram, 0, sizeof(jcv_diagram));
  jcv_diagram_generate(pointCount, list, nullptr, &diagram);

  const jcv_site *sites = jcv_diagram_get_sites(&diagram);
  for( int i = 0; i < diagram.numsites; ++i )
  {
      const jcv_site* site = &sites[i];
      std::cout << "\nAt site index " << site->index << " with position (" << site->p.x << ", " << site->p.y << ")\n";
      const jcv_graphedge* e = site->edges;
      int edgeCount = 0;
			while( e )
			{
			// 	std::cout << "\nSite pos  = " << site->p.x << ", " << site->p.y << "\n";
      //   std::cout << "Edge 1 pos = " << e->pos[0].x << ", " << e->pos[0].y << "\n";
      //   std::cout << "Edge 2 pos = " << e->pos[1].x << ", " << e->pos[1].y << "\n";
        edgeCount++;
				e = e->next;
			}
      // std::cout << "\nSite pos  = " << site->p.x << ", " << site->p.y << "\n";
      std::cout << "Number of edges is " << edgeCount << "\n";
      if(site->p.x == 0 && site->p.y == 0)
      {
        if(edgeCount != 4)
        {
          std::cout << "At (0,0) the cell does not have 4 edges!!!!!!!!!!!\n";
        }else{
          std::cout << "As expected, the cell at (0,0) has 4 edges\n";
        }
      }
  }
  std::cout << "Done printing sites and edge counts for this test\n\n\n";
  jcv_diagram_free( &diagram );

}

int main( int argc, const char *argv[])
{

  float eps = std::numeric_limits<float>::epsilon();
  std::cout << "\nDemonstration of bug at 2\n\n";

  printSquare( 1, 0 );
  printSquare( 3, 0 );
  std::cout << "\nThis is the buggy one\n";
  printSquare( 2, 0 ); //issue is here
  std::cout << "\nEnd of the buggy one\n";
  printSquare( 2, 1 );
  printSquare( 2, 2 );
  printSquare( 2+2*eps, 0 );
  printSquare( 2-2*eps, 0 );

  std::cout << "\n\n\nEnd of Tests\n";

  return 0;

}

The result from this is

Demonstration of bug at 2


Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (0, -1)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 3 with position (-1, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 0 with position (0, 0)
Number of edges is 4
As expected, the cell at (0,0) has 4 edges

At site index 1 with position (1, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 2 with position (0, 1)
Number of edges is 4
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test



Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (0, -3)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 3 with position (-3, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 0 with position (0, 0)
Number of edges is 4
As expected, the cell at (0,0) has 4 edges

At site index 1 with position (3, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 2 with position (0, 3)
Number of edges is 4
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test



This is the buggy one

Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (0, -2)
Number of edges is 3

At site index 3 with position (-2, 0)
Number of edges is 2

At site index 0 with position (0, 0)
Number of edges is 2
At (0,0) the cell does not have 4 edges!!!!!!!!!!!

At site index 1 with position (2, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 2 with position (0, 2)
Number of edges is 4
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test



End of the buggy one

Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (-1.41421, -1.41421)
Number of edges is 5

At site index 3 with position (1.41421, -1.41421)
Number of edges is 5

At site index 0 with position (0, 0)
Number of edges is 4
As expected, the cell at (0,0) has 4 edges

At site index 2 with position (-1.41421, 1.41421)
Number of edges is 5

At site index 1 with position (1.41421, 1.41421)
Number of edges is 5
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test



Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (8, 48)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 3 with position (6, 50)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 0 with position (8, 50)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 1 with position (10, 50)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 2 with position (8, 52)
Number of edges is 4
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test



Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (0, -2)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 3 with position (-2, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 0 with position (0, 0)
Number of edges is 4
As expected, the cell at (0,0) has 4 edges

At site index 1 with position (2, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 2 with position (0, 2)
Number of edges is 4
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test



Start Of Test

At site index 4 with position (0, -2)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 3 with position (-2, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 0 with position (0, 0)
Number of edges is 4
As expected, the cell at (0,0) has 4 edges

At site index 1 with position (2, 0)
Number of edges is 4

At site index 2 with position (0, 2)
Number of edges is 4
Done printing sites and edge counts for this test





End of Tests

I am not sure why this is happening, especially since it works when val = 2 + 2 *numeric_limits::epsilon.

I am hoping someone more familiar with the code can find it the reason

@david94133
Copy link

I'm pretty sure this is the same problem I ran into. When a site is on the boundary, the edges are not created properly. The open pull request I have fixes this issue; try applying it to your branch.

@archimedes4000
Copy link
Author

Sorry for the delay in responding, @david94133

This did not fix the issue I have run across.

@JCash JCash added the bug label Oct 6, 2018
@JCash
Copy link
Owner

JCash commented Oct 14, 2018

Fixed in #27 (v0.5.0)

@JCash JCash closed this as completed Oct 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants