Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with surface reflectivity #128

Closed
imoradi opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Issue with surface reflectivity #128

imoradi opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
CRTM CRTM

Comments

@imoradi
Copy link
Collaborator

imoradi commented Apr 5, 2024

There seems to be a bug with surface emissivity calculations so that the calculated reflectivity is outside the range for MW instruments. I am using FASTEM V6.0.

CRTM_Compute_RTSolution(WARNING) : Error assigning input for RTSolution algorithms
CRTM_Forward(WARNING) : Error computing RTSolution for atms_npp, channel 2, profile #856
Assign_Common_Input(WARNING) : WARNING SfcOptics%Reflectivity out of bounds [0,1]: 0.0000 1.0069
Assign_Common_Input(WARNING) : WARNING SfcOptics%Reflectivity out of bounds [0,1]: 0.0000 1.0388
.
.
CRTM_Forward(WARNING) : Error computing RTSolution for atms_npp, channel 16, profile #365
Assign_Common_Input(WARNING) : WARNING SfcOptics%Reflectivity out of bounds [0,1]: 0.0000 1.0578
CRTM_Compute_RTSolution(WARNING) : Error assigning input for RTSolution algorithms

The weird thing is that this only happens when doing all-sky whether with the default CloudCoeff or the DDA one - it does not matter.

I have a slightly older version of CRTM V3.0 that was cloned couple of months ago and that works fine so this bug was likely introduced recently.

@BenjaminTJohnson
Copy link
Contributor

BenjaminTJohnson commented Apr 5, 2024 via email

@imoradi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

imoradi commented Apr 5, 2024

OK, thank you.

@BenjaminRuston BenjaminRuston added the CRTM CRTM label Apr 8, 2024
@chengdang
Copy link
Contributor

Finished

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CRTM CRTM
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants