Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

explore fractional cloud selection on fractional aerosol impact #127

Closed
BenjaminTJohnson opened this issue Apr 4, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@BenjaminTJohnson
Copy link
Contributor

In #117, we found that the choice of cloud fraction has an impact on the aerosol-modified radiances as well. This isn't desirable behavior. The purpose of this issue is to verify that the aerosol radiances are still influenced, even for very low cloud content (i.e., where clouds would not dominate the radiances), and to verify that this impacts visible and infrared radiances.

Test 1: tiny cloud water content values for various/tiny cloud fractions, looking at whether aerosol-dominated radiances are influenced by the choice of cloud fraction.

Feel free to provide results of additional tests here.

@chengdang
Copy link
Contributor

Updates:
Currently, it seems there are no existing geovals contain both cloud and aerosol information in JEDI.
The test will for now adopt the simplified sample profiles in CRTM unit tests.

@BenjaminTJohnson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chengdang this is strange, right? There's almost always aerosols and clouds together in reality.

@gthompsnJCSDA @jeromebarre Greg/Jerome, would like to get your quick input on the observation that Cheng has made that there's no geovals that contain both clouds and aerosols - any thoughts?

@jeromebarre
Copy link
Collaborator

What are the geovals, where do they come from?

@chengdang
Copy link
Contributor

chengdang commented May 2, 2024

NOTE: it is important to note that the cloud content of these tests are constant, which is a wrong approach to set up this test.
Keeping these figures for future references only, the results do not represent the test results of this issue.

Tests for two sample profiles (top/bottom), color/numbers are cloud cover fraction:

Brightness temperature
cris399_npp_BT

Radiance
cris399_npp_Radiance

@chengdang
Copy link
Contributor

chengdang commented May 2, 2024

What are the geovals, where do they come from?

It's the modeled state variables right? @jeromebarre

@jeromebarre
Copy link
Collaborator

I meant where as skylab or input data of ctest or else? What instrument product footprint? etc etc

@BenjaminTJohnson
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing this issue. After rigorous testing, compensating for the change in cloud water content with changes in cloud_fraction, I find that there's no cloud fraction influence on the aerosol-impacted radiances.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants