New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rethink use of LocalStorage #62

Open

Inwerpsel opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

history needs info

Owner

Inwerpsel commented Feb 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Now that history is restored from IndexedDb, it's probably no longer needed to also store it in LocalStorage.

For now it was preserved because it can be read synchronously, so allows populating the latest state before the history is replayed.

Does the combination of IndexedDb + LocalStorage still make sense?

Any other ways of working with state to look at (maybe session storage)?

Inwerpsel added the needs info label

Inwerpsel added the history label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment