You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This discussion is a continuation of
http://code.google.com/p/upc-specification/issues/detail?id=30 that focuses on
the positive solution to the discrepancy between the static and dynamic threads
model w.r.t. array declarations.
Dan has provided numerous examples of what works only the static model, so I'll
just name the following as my motivating example:
shared A[THREADS][THREADS];
This should work in both the static and dynamic models. Paul Hargrove has
indicated that BUPC can do this an no implementer has given any evidence that
other UPC compilers can't do this as well.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 17 Oct 2012 at 2:25
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 17 Oct 2012 at 2:25The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: