Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sec 4.2.5. Process for the approval of evaluators missing #91

Closed
ssteinbuss opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #141
Closed

sec 4.2.5. Process for the approval of evaluators missing #91

ssteinbuss opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #141
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ssteinbuss
Copy link
Member

The approval process should be described in ~10 sentences in the RAM

@ssteinbuss ssteinbuss added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 19, 2022
@ssteinbuss ssteinbuss changed the title Process for the approval of evaluators missing sec 4.2 Process for the approval of evaluators missing Jan 19, 2022
@mokamhuber mokamhuber changed the title sec 4.2 Process for the approval of evaluators missing sec 4.2.5. Process for the approval of evaluators missing Feb 2, 2022
@mokamhuber
Copy link
Contributor

The approval process for evaluation facilities shall be briefly explained in chapter 4.2.5.

Editor: Natalia Simon - to be confirmed
Fallback & Review: @mohuber @Sonia-IDSA

@aliasimon
Copy link
Contributor

@mohuber @Sonia-IDSA @ssteinbuss I have added a section on the approval process for evaluation facilities. Let me know if you have comments or need additions.

@jonaswinkel01
Copy link
Contributor

@aliasimon If I saw this correctly, the link at the end of the processes page is not leading to a valid IDSA page with the whitepaper.
I checked the main branch and the 4_2_5_2_Certification-Process branch.

@aliasimon
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jonaswinkel01 : I took the link from IDS-G which is empty yet, but I thought it will be enriched soon?

@mokamhuber mokamhuber linked a pull request Apr 8, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants