Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Process Layer/Onboarding #59

Closed
16 tasks
HeinrichPet opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
16 tasks

Update Process Layer/Onboarding #59

HeinrichPet opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@HeinrichPet
Copy link
Contributor

HeinrichPet commented Dec 10, 2021

3_3_1_Onboarding.md

  • Update to the state from RuleBook "4.2.1.1 Admission of service providers".
  • What informations are needed for the certification process, registration to DAPS and ParIS?
  • Availabilty Setup must be updated. DMZ can be used, but also external Cloud services etc. Currently no need to distinction betwenn internal/external connector, cause no implementation supports that.
  • Connector Configuration is very dependend on the connector implementation. For onboarding a connector we have to figure out what the minimal common configuration is (x509, URL, TLS certificate, ?).
  • Not sure if we need the security setup section in onboarding. We maybe should put the verification in the exchanging data
  • Clearify if there will be a process of automatically getting the x509 certificate. Currently it is transfered manually via EMail, Matrix, ...

Consider besides Connector (Data Provider/Consumer) onboarding also:

  • Broker
  • AppStore,
  • Clearing House,
  • Vocabulary Provider,
  • DAPS,
  • ParIS
  • Service Provider,
  • Data Owner,
  • Data User,
  • App Provider
@HeinrichPet
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ssteinbuss Should we copy and maybe detail the IDS onboarding parts from Rule book 4.2.1.1 or should we refer to the rule book?
The same question applies, of course, to many of the processes that are also written up in the Rule Book.

@ssteinbuss
Copy link
Member

@HeinrichPet : good point. For me, there should be again a clear distinction between RAM and RuleBook. The RAM should focus on the technical steps and the RuleBook should then indicate and explain the organizational flow. Please take the processes from the RuleBook as foundation and detail here. The Rule Book should then only cover the administrative aspects.

I assume you refer to the onboarding process in section 4.2.1.1.1? There are not too many other processes?

@ssteinbuss
Copy link
Member

ssteinbuss commented Dec 16, 2021

see also #67

@sebbader
Copy link
Contributor

I have added my view in #76, however not regarding any relations between the RAM and the Rule Book yet.

@ssteinbuss
Copy link
Member

Closed by #193

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants